THE GEORGE BLAZYCA PRIZE IN EAST EUROPEAN STUDIES

BASEES has established the George Blazyca Prize in recognition of the outstanding contribution to its field of study made by the late George Blazyca. The George Blazyca Prize is offered annually by the British Association for Slavonic and East European Studies for scholarly work of high quality in East European studies. This is taken to include those countries of Eastern Europe that were formerly under communist rule that were not part of the Soviet Union. Items eligible for nomination are singly or jointly authored monographs. The authors of nominated works must at the time of nomination be members or associate members of the Association. 

The Blazyca Prize scheme is accepting nominations for books published in 2023. The deadline for nominations is 30 June 2024. The winners will be announced early in 2025 and the prize (if awarded) will be presented at the annual dinner of the 2025 conference.

The works received will be scored by our judges against criteria of originality, rigour and significance. Works nominated for consideration must be of a scholarly character and must be in English. Winners will be works that make a major contribution to East European Studies. For 2023-24, our judges will be Agnieszka Kubal (Honorary Associate Professor, UCL, SSEES) and Richard Mills (University of East Anglia). 

The current regulations are as follows:

1. The prize, of one hundred pounds, plus a ticket for the annual conference dinner, is offered annually for scholarly work of high quality in East European studies.

2. A nomination may take the form of a monograph, usually authored by either one or two authors. Edited collections of essays are not eligible for the scheme.

3. The deadline for submission of nominations shall be 30 June each year in respect of publications whose imprint date is the previous calendar year. The prize is awarded (if a recommendation is made to do so) at the Association's annual conference in the spring of the calendar year following the deadline for submission of nominations.

4. The authors of nominated work must at the time of nomination be members or associate members of the British Association for Slavonic and East European Studies. It is the responsibility of the nominator to check the BASEES membership status of potential nominees and ensure that membership is in place prior to nomination. Nominations of non-members will not be considered.

5. Awards will be made by a jury whose membership will be approved by the Executive Committee of the Association. This will normally consist of a former President of the Association and another judge, both of whom are selected to represent the diversity, breadth and scholarly excellence of the discipline and our organization.

6. The jury will usually award the Prize to one nominated work in any year, but judges can also make honourable mentions.

7. Works may be nominated for consideration by the authors, or by publishers, librarians or other scholars.

8. Nominations should be made on the standard form for this purpose, which is available as a download from this page, and submitted to the Secretary of the Association, or via electronic submission below.

9. Please send copies of the nominated book to all members of this year’s Book Prize committee listed below. Ideally, books will be received before nominations close. Submissions will normally be accepted in hard copy (preferred) or electronic copy (if no hard copy is available). We encourage submission of an electronic copy plus a hard copy. Hard copies should be sent to:

   Dr Agnieszka Kubal

   Associate Professor in Sociology
   SSEES
   University College London
   Office No. 421, 16 Taviton Street
   London, WC1H 0BW
   United Kingdom

   Dr. Richard Mills

   School of History
   Faculty of Arts and Humanities
   University of East Anglia
   Norwich
   NR4 7TJ

10. Work may be submitted both for the George Blazyca Prize and the BASEES Women’s Forum prizes, where relevant. More detail on the conditions of the Women’s Forum prizes can be found here.

CURRENT WINNER

Ewa Stańczyk, Comics and Nation: Power, Pop Culture, and Political Transformation in Poland (Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2022).

Exploring Poland’s century long love-hate relationship with the global comic book industry, Ewa Stańczyk’s Comics and Nation captures the myriad ways in which the medium interacted with and shaped Polish society, from the establishment of the Second Polish Republic in 1918 to the post-socialist contemporary state. The extent of interaction between this ‘peripheral’ outpost and the transnational comic book phenomenon has ebbed and flowed, from the largely ‘rhetorical’ engagement of Stalinist era isolationism, when the state dismissed comics as an imperialist threat, via the socialist-era exports to the West of the 1970s, to the rampant free market conditions of the 1990s, when many in the Polish scene felt flooded with ‘foreign junk’. Yet, regardless of the prevailing domestic political situation, Polish comic book producers, publishers, readers, critics, and state officials have always been active participants on the global stage. Stańczyk’s ambitious, carefully researched, and highly accessible account foregrounds a medium long dismissed as marginal to Polish culture. This enables her to provide the reader with an innovative new perspective on modern Polish history in transnational context. 

Honorable mention:

Anca Parvulescu and Manuela Boatcă, Creolizing the Modern: Transylvania across Empires (Cornell University Press, 2022 

A remarkable collaborative experiment between a literary critic and a sociologist, Creolizing the Modern casts Transylvania as an inter-imperial and multilingual semiperiphery. Taking one of world literature’s numerous ‘great unread’ novels as its point of departure, this boldly interdisciplinary and methodologically stimulating monograph contributes to and problematises a wide range of theoretical debates. In part, it does so by posing an intriguing question: ‘What does the world look like from the standpoint of a small village in Transylvania, a region in East-Central Europe?’

The jury for the 2022-23 cycle consisted of Dr Alison Long (Keele University) and Dr Richard Mills (University of East Anglia).

Past Winners

2007

Frances Millard, Elections, Parties and Representation in Post-Communist Europe (Palgrave, 2004)

2007

Neil Bermel, Linguistic authority, language ideology, and metaphor: the Czech orthography wars (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2007)

2008

Lucian N. Leustean, Orthodoxy and the Cold War. Religion and Political Power in Romania, 1947-65 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008)

2009

Frances Millard (University of Essex): Democratic Elections in Poland, 1991-2007 (BASEES-Routledge, 2009)

2010

Catherine Baker (University of Southampton and UCL SSEES): Sounds of the Borderland: Popular Music, War and Nationalism in Croatia since 1991 (Ashgate, 2010)

2011

Anne White, Polish Families and Migration since EU Accession (Policy Press, 2011)

2012

Longina Jakubowska, Patrons of History: Nobility, Capital and Political Transitions in Poland (Ashgate, 2012)

2013

James Krapfl (McGill University, Montreal, Canada) for Revolution with a Human Face: Politics, Culture, and Community in Czechoslovakia, 1989-1992 (Cornell University Press, 2013) 

2014

James Dawson (University College London) for Cultures of Democracy in Serbia and Bulgaria: How Ideas Shape Publics (Ashgate, 2014)

2015

Laurien Crump, The Warsaw Pact Reconsidered: International Relations in Eastern Europe, 1955 – 1969 (Routledge, 2015)

2016

Jakub Beneš, Workers and Nationalism: Czech and German Social Democracy in Hapsburg Austria, 1890-1918 (Oxford University Press, 2016)

2017

Melissa Feinberg, Curtain of Lies: The Battle over Truth in Stalinist Eastern Europe (Oxford University Press, 2017)

2018

Natalia Nowakowska, King Sigismund of Poland and Martin Luther: the Reformation before Confessionalisation (Oxford University Press, 2018).

2019

Thomas Lorman, The Making of the Slovak People’s Party: Religion, Nationalism and the Culture War in Early 20th-Century Europe (Bloomsbury Academic, 2019).

2020

Gabor Scheiring, The Retreat of Liberal Democracy: Authoritarian Capitalism and the Accumulative State in Hungary (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020).

2021

Roland Clark (University of Liverpool) for his work Sectarianism and Renewal in 1920s Romania: The Limits of Orthodoxy and Nation-Building (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021).

Past winners - with citations

2021 (awarded 2023)

Roland Clark (University of Liverpool) for his work Sectarianism and Renewal in 1920s Romania: The Limits of Orthodoxy and Nation-Building (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021).

Judges: Dr Alison Long (Keele University) and Dr Nigel Swain (University of Liverpool)

Roland Clark's Sectarianism and Renewal in 1920s Romania presents a compelling case study of nation-building and both organized and "unofficial" religious faith in a country developing its own identity in the post-First World War period. The judges felt that Clark knitted together the changes in Romanian civil society with an expansion of sectarianism in religion, encompassing schisms within the Romanian Orthodox Church and influences of Protestantism and Catholicism outside it. The author paints a vivid picture of vibrancy and variety, and his argument that the Orthodox Church could only ‘renew’ by taking on the ideas of its critics is well made. The effective and engaging style of this work leads the reader through the different sects, influences and personalities involved, from the Repenters and Missionaries to The Lord’s Army and The Stork’s Nest, offering a spiritual panorama across a multiplicity of sects more variegated than the well-known dominance of the Orthodox Church and its proximity to government would lead one to expect. The judges felt that this was a scholarly, well-researched and well-written work, and a worthy winner of the Blazyca Prize.

THE GEORGE BLAZYCA PRIZE 2020 (AWARDED 2022)

Gabor Scheiring, The Retreat of Liberal Democracy: Authoritarian Capitalism and the Accumulative State in Hungary (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020).

Scheiring’s The Retreat of Liberal Democracy: Authoritarian Capitalism and the Accumulative State in Hungary addresses one of the most pressing questions of Central and Eastern Europe today: why has Hungary, a member of the EU and NATO, embraced ‘illiberal democracy’? The answer is that significant sections of the Hungarian population have a material interest in it. The judges found Scheiring’s book to be a tour de force, combining political, sociological and economic analysis, always supported by extensive empirical evidence. He documents, with statistics and concrete examples, the extent of economic dependence, dislocation and precarity occasioned by post-socialist marketisation; the emergence of a new bourgeoisie dramatically divided between national elements supporting Fidesz and those, mainly from the historic political left, associated with the transnational economic sector, banking and academia; and an authoritarian state which preserves the façade of democracy to manufacture consent, portraying itself as the guarantor of unity and security against looming threats of international migration and terrorism. In his account, an abandoned working class seeks solace in neo-nationalism, the better-off are bought off with low taxes and generous family benefits, domestic companies are offered protection to pursue cheap-labour-based development; and transnational capital, although demonised politically, receives covert tax concessions to produce high(ish) technology exports. This work not only gives an important insight into the politics of Hungary, but offers a template as to how authoritarian regimes can develop within (ostensibly) democratic frameworks. 

THE GEORGE BLAZYCA PRIZE 2019 (AWARDED 2021)

Thomas Lorman, The Making of the Slovak People’s Party: Religion, Nationalism and the Culture War in Early 20th-Century Europe (Bloomsbury Academic, 2019).

Lorman’s book explores the centrality of Catholicism to Slovak nationalism through an analysis of the Slovak People’s Party. By pushing the story of the party’s origins back to before the formal establishment of a party of that name, and by examining the intellectual trajectories of the people who formed it, he provides profound insights into the nature of the political right in Central Europe, both past and present. The intermingling of religion and ethnicity began when Magyar-speaking officials, representing a nevertheless mainly Catholic Hungarian state, imposed ‘liberal’ civil marriage on Slovak-speaking, traditionalist Catholic clerics. In the protracted story, which Lorman develops elegantly, with painstaking and meticulous research across Hungarian and Slovak sources, mainly Catholic Slovak activists, feeling themselves under assault, gravitated first to the Catholic People’s Party of 1894, which was particularly strong in the Slovak highlands, before creating, in 1905 and relaunching in 1913, the Slovak People’s Party itself, with a somewhat stronger, and gradually increasing, national agenda. The enemy from the start was liberalism and its perceived attack on Catholicism and Slovaks alike, and liberalism was represented first by Hungary, and then, with telling parallels, the Czechoslovak state. Also common to the party, both before and after 1918, were its antisemitism, its radicalism, its disdain for democracy, its cult of youth and its preference for ambiguous rhetoric. Lorman is equally at home identifying the policy differences between the key individuals in the story (Hlinka, Tiso, Mach, Skyčák) and portraying the emergence of nineteenth-century Slovak Catholic organisations (religious societies, sodalities, clubs, but also banks and cooperatives) which provided the popular groundswell for Slovak nationalism. By breaching the 1918 caesura, his book is a major contribution not only to Slovak (and therefore of course Hungarian and Czechoslovak) history, but also to our understanding of right-wing politics in the region. 

THE GEORGE BLAZYCA PRIZE 2018 (AWARDED 2020)

Natalia Nowakowska , King Sigismund of Poland and Martin Luther: the Reformation before Confessionalisation (Oxford University Press, 2018).

This is a professionally executed work of original scholarship both in subject matter and approach. Nowakowska first reconstructs a basic historical narrative of a period ignored by the current generation of historians and then subjects it to a meticulous and original linguistic analysis to identify a ‘pre-confessional’ understanding of the Reformation. All of the apparent contradictions of Sigismund’s domestic and diplomatic policies that have been identified by previous scholars fall into place once this early period in the Polish Reformation is seen through this pre-confessional lens, a lens that would soon be superseded as Europe began to make confessional distinctions between Lutherans and Catholics. The book makes a substantial contribution to the history of the Reformation generally and to the Polish Reformation in particular by questioning earlier claims that Lutherans in Poland were mainly German, and that Poland at the time was prematurely tolerant.

The George Blazyca Prize 2017 (Awarded 2019)

MELISSA FEINBERG, Curtain of Lies: The Battle over Truth in Stalinist Eastern Europe (Oxford University Press, 2017)

 This is a meticulously researched and highly readable monograph which remains unhappily relevant in today’s ‘post-truth’ world. Feinberg investigates the social consequences of the climate of fear and preoccupation with ‘tropes of truth and lies’ shared by the USA and USSR.  East European refugees, interviewed by Western researchers, tended to portray their former lives in black and white; Feinberg argues that, even while they disbelieved the content of communist propaganda, they were successfully socialised into viewing the world in polarised terms. Refugees’ stories of fear of informers and shortages, and hopes for US intervention, helped shape the perceptions of Western governments regarding the Communist bloc.   Although it might not seem possible to find much new to say about Cold War propaganda, this is a fresh and original take on the period, with some fascinating empirical detail (for example, about rumours that US troops were preparing to liberate Eastern Europe with the aid of sleep-inducing bombs).

The George Blazyca Prize 2016 (Awarded 2018)

Jakub Beneš, Workers and Nationalism: Czech and German Social Democracy in Hapsburg Austria, 1890-1918 (Oxford University Press, 2016)

Jakub S. Beneš’s book, Workers and Nationalism: Czech and German Social Democracy in Habsburg Austria, 1890-1918, addresses the issues of nationalism, socialism and ‘national indifference’ in the Austrian half of the Austro-Hungarian Empire at the turn of the twentieth century. Beneš takes issue with Hans Mommsen’s argument that Czech Social Democrats adopted nationalist politics because the party leadership pandered to petty bourgeois elements. He directs our attention, rather, to the grass roots, where a transnational, socialist movement fighting exclusion from political society on class grounds gradually switched focus, once the vote had been won, to a struggle against exclusion on the grounds of national minority status. In the process, social democracy split along ethnic lines, because neither side understood the concerns of the other. As Beneš insists and illustrates, with copious and vivid evidence from Czech and German memoirs, newspapers, pamphlets and popular literature, this distinctly working-class variant of nationalism was, by the time of the First World War, a mass movement; the opinions of party leaders were irrelevant.

The George Blazyca Prize 2015 (Awarded 2017)

Laurien Crump The Warsaw Pact Reconsidered: International Relations in Eastern Europe, 1955 – 1969 (Routledge, 2015)

The Warsaw Pact Reconsidered offers us an original and nuanced insight into what had been previously understood to be a mere instrument of Soviet domination. This book demonstrates the fallacy of this supposition, using a detailed and very impressive body of multi-archival data. The author reveals the extent to which the Pact was disrupted by internal turmoil, disagreements, tensions and the downright incompatibility of preferences, all of which rendered the organisation, at times, barely coherent. Indeed, so revealing are some of the details the book provides, that it may not be far-fetched to say that it will transform our understanding of the functioning of the Soviet bloc, certainly from the security perspective. Moreover, The Warsaw Pact Reconsidered is a thoroughly pleasurable read.  At times, it resembles a political thriller, enticing the reader to work through it at a cracking pace. The book certainly deserves a wide audience insofar as it offers insights that go well beyond those which might typically be expected from a book on the defunct security alliance. While all the books submitted for the 2015 Blazyca Prize were strong contenders for one reason or another, the judges readily agreed that Laurien Crump’s fine monograph was a worthy winner.

The George Blazyca Prize 2014 (Awarded 2016)

James Dawson, Cultures of Democracy in Serbia and Bulgaria: How Ideas Shape Publics (Ashgate, 2014)

This is a very original book which presents a vivid account of the political culture in two cities of South-East Europe. By conducting focus groups, interviews and participant observation in Niš and Plovdiv, Dr Dawson was able to identify and analyse common discourses about politics which underpin the ‘public sphere’. These help explain the persistence of a liberal strand of public opinion in Serbia which Dawson claims to be nearly absent in Bulgaria. The book skilfully shows how political cultures originating in the communist period are constantly reproduced in discussions among ordinary citizens, and how they both support but also contradict messages coming from the media and politicians. The book makes a great contribution to reinvigorating debates on democracy and democratisation in post-communist countries by the focus away from institutions and by bringing ‘the people’ in. The book sets new standards for political ethnography and illuminates the pivotal role of the cultural dimension.

James Krapfl (McGill University, Montreal, Canada) for Revolution with a Human Face: Politics, Culture, and Community in Czechoslovakia, 1989-1992 (Cornell University Press, 2013) 

This analysis of Czechoslovakia’s ‘gentle revolution’ and the role of citizens’ movements in the changes that followed  is based on painstaking original research of contemporary material from a variety of sources throughout Czechoslovakia which the author has succeeded in presenting to readers in an eminently readable book.  The bottom-up, citizen-centred perspective on the events of 1989 provides the reader with an insight into the debates, discussions, thinking and narratives which accompanied them. In doing so, the book elevates the ordinary citizens to a justified prominence in our understanding of the revolution, thereby allowing the reader a privileged insight which might otherwise have been lost to time, crowded out by 'high politics'. This is a fresh and original perspective, which 'brings the people back into revolutions'. Twenty-five years on, as politicians and political scientists have to address the contemporary distrust and disillusionment towards established political elites throughout the region, this is a timely reminder of how different politics looked when communism first fell.

Frances Millard (University of Essex) for Elections, Parties and Representation in Post-Communist Europe (Palgrave, 2004)

"This excellent book provides a timely exploration of the relationship between the development of political parties and the quality of democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. It combines innovative approaches from political science with a deep knowledge of the new political systems of the region to identify a complex set of different emerging trends. Millard makes clear that it is only in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovenia that the political systems have fully stabilized. Elsewhere there continues to be considerable electoral volatility as new political elites struggle to win the confidence of the electorate. With chapters devoted to such issues as the variety of electoral mechanisms employed throughout the region, the character of different party systems, the selection of candidates and their social background, and the decline in the number of women in political life, the book brings real breadth as well as depth to its subject. 
Millard concludes by citing a comment made about Latvia, but bearing on the region as a whole: ‘ordinary citizens have doubts as to the quality and trustworthiness of their political representatives and their mistrust and cynicism over the political process is widespread.’ She thus reveals that, despite many differences, the politics of Post-Communist Europe is not so very different from our own." (Terry Cox and Geoffrey Swain, April 2007)

Neil Bermel, Linguistic authority, language ideology, and metaphor: the Czech orthography wars (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2007).

"Linguistics is a science that is not always accessible to the non-specialist. However, Neil Bermel’s superb study of what he calls the ‘Czech Orthography Wars’ shows that linguistics can be made accessible to a more general scholarly audience. Not only does that mean that the reader of this book can soon take in his or her stride sentences like ‘this mismatch between spelling and pronunciation, called “final devoicing”, is a feature of the Czech morphophonemic writing system’, or ‘intervocalic and prevocalic “s” in Czech is pronounced “z”’, but the reader quickly realises why this matters so much to those living in the Czech Republic. Bermel goes through the history of the Czech language, looking at its evolution from the 15th to the 20th centuries and analysing how repeated attempts were made to bring sound into line with spelling; but he also makes clear how those attempts were always shaped by the political and cultural climate of the time. The centre piece of the study, the orthodoxy wars themselves in the early 1990s, were so bitterly fought, Bermel argues, because the proposals for a new orthography coincided with the end of communism and the breakdown of what Bermel calls ‘the fragile consensus that reforms would happen from time to time’. In other words, many Czechs were uncertain whether the application of strict spelling rules was a feature of communist oppression or five hundred years of Czech tradition. This fascinating study of linguistic and cultural politics, of what it means to be Czech, is a worthy winner of the Blazyca Prize for 2007." (Geoff Swain and Frances Millard, March 2009)

Lucian N. Leustean, (Aston University), Orthodoxy and the Cold War. Religion and Political Power in Romania, 1947-65 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008)

" When Petru Groza died in January 1958, Romania’s pro-communist Prime Minister from 1945 to 1952 was given a religious burial, officiated by Patriarch Justinian of the Romanian Orthodox Church and attended by leading officials from the Romanian Communist Party and foreign guests. As the son of a priest and a member of the Synod before the Second World War, there was a logic to this, but for communists to associate themselves so publicly with a church was unusual to say the least, especially as the funeral took place at a time when the communist authorities were arresting priests, including Patriarch Justinian’s own son-in-law. It is the unique and contradictory relationship between Romanian communists and the Romanian Orthodox Church which is explored by Lucian Leustean in this scholarly study. Leustean begins by establishing that for the Orthodox Church, relations with the state had always been guided by the concept of “symphonia”, Patriarch and Emperor working in harmony. This tradition had continued as Romania gained its independence, and the Orthodox Church saw no reason why it should not continue under communism. Stepping forward in this way, even supporting the collectivisation of agriculture, enabled the Orthodox Church to get the state’s backing in removing its Uniate rival, continued state funding for priests’ salaries and the preservation of many of its monasteries. Despite being caricatured in the West as the Red Patriarch, Justinian emerges from this study as someone who was genuinely interested in preserving the Church, even if this involved tolling Church bells on the occasion of Stalin’s death. When, after Stalin’s death, Romanian communists adopted a more nationalist version of communism, the Orthodox Church’s determination to canonise leaders from among the Romanian faithful complemented this strategy. Lucian Leustean has written a fascinating book about an unexplored aspect of the reality of communist rule in Eastern Europe. It is a worthy winner of this year’s Blazyca Prize." (Frances Millard and Geoff Swain, March 2010)

Frances Millard (University of Essex): Democratic Elections in Poland, 1991-2007 (BASEES-Routledge, 2009)

After twenty years of post-communist democracy the structure of Poland's political parties remained confused, unstable and fluid. Parties had come and gone and leading politicians had frequently shifted their party bases. Frances Millard studies this process by focusing on the elections, both presidential and parliamentary, from 1990 to 2007. She brings a vast amount of knowledge, acquired from following Polish politics over the period, and sets developments against insights from political science literature. The book fills an important gap by providing, in a cohEmail Address of Person Submitting Nominationerent and accessible form, an account of recent Polish political history, thereby demonstrating why expectations of a straightforward consolidation of a stable party system have proved unrealistic. This book is likely to become an important source for all those following Polish politics and is a worthy winner of the Blazyca prize. (March 2011)

Catherine Baker (University of Southampton and UCL SSEES): Sounds of the Borderland: Popular Music, War and Nationalism in Croatia since 1991 (Ashgate, 2010)

Catherine Baker’s work is exceptional in both its originality and its careful research, and in its readability: it is unusual for a scholarly and thoroughly-researched work to be able to engage a broad academic audience without regard for discipline and area specialism. The book looks at the development of patriotic popular music in Croatia after the declaration of independence and outbreak of war in 1991, following the shifting political agendas for nearly two decades. The reader learns of the tamburica, Croatia’s national instrument used in the 1993 Eurovision song contest; of “war veterans” protest songs sung at nationalist rallies; and, in the last few year, of the popularity among Croatian youngsters of Serbian “pop-folk” music, although Catherine feels that this music’s current popularity does not signify an act of ethnic reconciliation. Catherine suggests that “popular music was one of the most important fields where contests over memory and historical revisionism were played out”. However, this is not primarily a book about politics, but about the interaction of music and society in a time of rapid change and heightened emotion. Special praise should be given to the author for the skilful writing of the book. Ordering and structuring the rich and diverse material gathered into a coherent manuscript is no mean feat. Despite the wealth of detail, song titles, names, venues and dates, the reader does not feel disoriented and can easily follow the dynamics of changing times. Should anyone doubt the significance of the subject matter, they should follow the advice of the author and look up the songs mentioned on YouTube – some of the videos have been viewed nearly a million times, even if uploaded well into the new millennium. And listening to the music also helps the reader understand the enthusiasm with which this book was researched and written, and which is successfully transferred to the written page. Sounds of the Borderland is thus a worthy winner of the 2012 Blazyca Prize. (Karen Henderson and Geoffrey Swain)

Anne White, Polish Families and Migration since EU Accession (Policy Press, 2011)

This book, which the judges considered model interdisciplinary work, contains fascinating original research which has been carefully crafted into a well-structured book that is admirably readable and accessible to a wide audience. The author shows a strong familiarity with theory and uses this well to explain important points to the readers without losing overall clarity of expression. Whilst much research on migrants from Central and Eastern Europe has tended to focus on their situation in the UK, this book considers both sides of the story and has also involved detailed research in Eastern Poland investigating the crucial push factors that influence family strategies. We discover a very Polish world where tradition is as important as the changes imposed by economics, and financial security is sought in a world full of uncertainties. The result is a book that is  timely and topical and will be of interest to policy makers and academics alike.

Longina Jakubowska, Patrons of History: Nobility, Capital and Political Transitions in Poland (Ashgate, 2012)

The author succeeds admirably in presenting original research in a way that both engages the reader and introduces what for most will be a fresh perspective on twentieth century Polish history. The book is the product of 15 years of interviews conducted with members of the Polish gentry as well as archival research and observation. Although it is firmly located in ethnology, the book has a very wide general appeal which the judges believe will become an essential text for scholars of the region. While providing many unusual vignettes of life in Poland, it also contributes to an understanding of the complexities of post-communist politics by analyzing how social capital can be transferred even through a protracted period of radical change. She illustrates how the ‘symbolic capital’ of class has remained important and the gentry have overcome their former disempowerment.  It is a subtle, but extremely well-written book, with excellent structure and a creative use of theory and will be lasting significance as it intersects well with other research being done in the field.  In many respects Jakubowska has succeeded in getting beyond a narrow focus on ethnicity and national identity as markers of difference and presented the reader with a different set of stories about contemporary Poland.